Sunday, May 29, 2011

fat ugly baby pictures

fat ugly baby pictures. funny looking aby with a
  • funny looking aby with a



  • Irishman
    May 3, 02:48 PM
    The 6950m and 6970m are also available in 2gb models. That would help with the larger resolution of the 27" display. Let's hope for that as well!

    Well, you got what you wanted on the 2GB 6970m! At least as a BTO option.





    fat ugly baby pictures. quot;No, your fat makes
  • quot;No, your fat makes



  • VanNess
    Jul 20, 02:27 AM
    Most likely it would work exactly like how a normal streamed QuickTime movie downloads. It buffers for a few minutes, and then you can start watching it, and it downloads in the background, and saves it to file letting you watch it again for X times/days. This is exactly how Movielink works.

    Ah, ok, thanks for the info. I never used Movielink and I'm not familiar with it. I've never steamed any content that would even approximate the length of a hollywood movie, with the possible exception of S. Jobs keynotes. So far, H264 seems to serve those very well. (Except for the first week or so, when it seems the server is bombarded.) In any event, I don't think that content is actually downloaded to disk as its streamed.

    On the other hand, movie trailers (like Apple Quicktime trailers) are downloaded in the background to some secret location on the disk as they are watched, and, although they usually perform well, occasionally they hiccup (stall momentarily) for whatever reason (traffic, general internet latency), sometimes even the regular non-HD ones. So if Movielink has figured out a way to provide a bulletproof buffer for streaming high-quality (DVD) content over regular US DSL, great. Maybe Apple can one-up them with even higher, H264 quality.

    But if the stream ever stalls, even momentarily, count me out. My gauge for judging (and accepting) any online Movie service is that it must meet or exceed the present terrestrial-based DVD experience. There is a local DVD rental store within 2 blocks of where I live. That modest, unassuming little establishment happens to be Apple's and Movielink's greatest competition in my book. They have to give me a compelling reason not to go there.





    fat ugly baby pictures. Ugly Betty#39;s aby bonanza
  • Ugly Betty#39;s aby bonanza



  • RaceTripper
    Jan 10, 07:50 PM
    So very sad but true. F1 fan here, and rally if I can ever find time to watch it. I might not be a F1 fan for much longer though if they keep making "the ultimate racing machine" slower and slower by limiting the technology :mad: I understand the safety reasons, but its getting to be worse than the bicycle world:eek:
    I was a big F1 fan, but once the USGP got cancelled my wife and I became huge ALMS fans. Evey year we go to the 12 Hours of Sebring, Road America, and Petit Le Mans. The racing is much better than in F1, and the series is far more fan friendly. I've even started working in the hot pits doing IMSA pit notes during races, in addition to the race photography I have been doing for fun.

    One point to consider about F1 rules changes. Slowing the cars down could improve the on track action. Right now they are so fast they get too spread out and it becomes a parade of cars with the action being how the gaps change. When you slow the cars down they start to bunch together again and force some wheel to wheel battles. The turbo 4-bangers coming in a few years could prove to add some excitement back to F1, even if it does cost us the terrific sound of high revving V8 engines. The rule changes aren't so much about safety as they are about trying to get a race to ensue.





    fat ugly baby pictures. fat ugly baby pictures. Yellow fat boy (-_- soo ugly); Yellow fat boy (-_- soo ugly). aegisdesign. Jul 10, 12:54 PM
  • fat ugly baby pictures. Yellow fat boy (-_- soo ugly); Yellow fat boy (-_- soo ugly). aegisdesign. Jul 10, 12:54 PM



  • a456
    Sep 1, 02:19 PM
    At WWDC, Apple mentioned one of Leopard's features - 64 bit application support. Let's fast forward to Leopard's release day and look at Apple's line. I'm guessing that all all their machines will have 64-bit processors, but surely the difference in processors used in the Macbook, Macbook Pro, the iMac, and the mini, surely can't be just speed, and all using the Merom? The iMac will have Conroe, maybe an E6600.

    If the iMac had the Conroe and this is more powerful than the Merom wouldn't this continue to place the processing power of the consumer desktop above the power of the 'pro' laptop, which has been one of the problems for some time now? If they both had Merom at least they would be equal. Don't know about the Macbook and the Mini though, I guess the distinction is that they don't have separate graphics cards.





    fat ugly baby pictures. Posted in Ugly Babies | 5
  • Posted in Ugly Babies | 5



  • imnotatfault
    Aug 19, 09:43 AM
    Yeah. let's hope... But my confidence in the ability of others to be as smart and cool as I was never developed as a child.

    I've just been surprised by all the calls (almost frenzy-like) by others on this thread (it seems you and I are pretty much on the same page as I just read your comments you entered while I was entering my own) to make the iPod, basically, an all-in-one type peice of crap. I have honestly asked why they really need this and have only sen one (maybe two) cool, albeit niche-type, uses.

    While some may say Steve is mercurial, I hope in this case he is 1) on my side here, 2) just as mercurial and controlling as rumored and 3) pays no attention to this thread or any polls in which like-minded individuals participate.

    Well put. And I think outside of the hardcore businessy types, those features are really lost on the everday person. My girlfriend has a Dell Axim, and it was really fun to write with a stylus and put my to-do list in and put stuff into the calendar. Two weeks later, I pulled it out to play a game of Solitaire then turned it back off.

    I KNOW this isn't what Apple intends, and by doing this, they'd alienate the market they worked so hard to gain over, which are casual users who don't know much about technology (which is why they stick with PC--comfort, not active choice).





    fat ugly baby pictures. being quot;fat and uglyquot;.
  • being quot;fat and uglyquot;.



  • miamiracing
    Jan 27, 07:59 AM
    Some pics of my Impreza after a night of freezing rain:

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5203/5366971777_ce8b11c76d_b.jpg

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5090/5366971673_6d6ab4f12e_b.jpg

    nice shots! yea i hated the freezing rain last week.

    how do you like the snow we got last night haha





    fat ugly baby pictures. A big fat ugly baby.
  • A big fat ugly baby.



  • noservice2001
    Oct 23, 07:15 AM
    o please red!!!





    fat ugly baby pictures. really ugly baby pictures. ugly babies. Ugly Babies
  • really ugly baby pictures. ugly babies. Ugly Babies



  • KirkL
    Mar 31, 06:40 AM
    Can you post a screenshot?

    http://d2omthbq56rzfx.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-Shot-2011-03-30-at-9.31.06-PM-670x462.png





    fat ugly baby pictures. Guess who hates your aby?
  • Guess who hates your aby?



  • 0010101
    Nov 28, 12:47 PM
    I think it's way to early to make any judgments regarding Zune sales. Let's see what the numbers look like after Christmas.

    5 years ago, Zune, in it's current form, might have been a hit.. but not in todays market. Especially considering folks who have lots of money tied up in MP3's aren't going to be real interested in throwing them away, and starting all over again.. or spend countless hours converting thousands of files.

    I don't find it ugly, but I sure don't care for the brown color. What I noticed most about the Zune is that it feels and looks cheap in person. Like what i'd expect a mockup or prototype unit to look and feel like. From a distance, it looks fine.. you get close up, and.. well.. not so nice.

    Almost like they rushed it to market in time for the '06 Holiday buying season.

    Apple has the portable MP3 player market locked up.. with models in all but the lowest price ranges.. and the Zune sure is no immediate threat.

    Comparisons of the Zune to the Xbox are not really fair.. they are two entirely different products.

    Microsoft (as well as Sony and Nintendo) can sell the unit itself for at or below their actual cost, because where they make the real money isn't in selling the game console, but in selling the games and accessories.

    With MP3 players, you have to make money on the product sale, because there is no guarantee the end user will buy all their music from your 'store'.

    Zune specs are subject to change.. as are most retail products. Don't forget that when the iPod was first introduced, it only worked with Macs.. then they made a Windows version.. then finally they made an iPod that worked with either computer.

    I expect a new version of the Zune by spring.. with new features, and less restriction.





    fat ugly baby pictures. ugly, fat woman with a
  • ugly, fat woman with a



  • berkleeboy210
    Sep 1, 12:03 PM
    just checked the apple store... currently 1-2 business day shipping time for the iMac.

    this could mean updates on 9/5.....

    MBP's still ship w/ in 24hrs though.





    fat ugly baby pictures. Ugly she boon nigger thinks
  • Ugly she boon nigger thinks



  • Silentwave
    Jul 14, 02:57 AM
    ... and what you'd loose when the disk goes bad :mad:

    so just burn two :)

    or just wait until ferroelectric memory comes out- imagine having the equivalent of a few 500GB external HDs in a device the size of a small thumb drive, solid state but without any heads to crash- the capacity of huge HDs, the reliability and ability to maintain data without power of flash memory, and access speed like RAM.





    fat ugly baby pictures. such thing as an ugly baby
  • such thing as an ugly baby



  • rmhop81
    Sep 7, 05:41 PM
    well the problem is that sub accounts cannot exist without the main account and main account has to be renewed every year. so this essentially means i cannot use family pack by myself for 5 years.
    i never said that u could go 5 years off one family pack. i simply posted those bc people were complaining about apple's price....newegg is cheaper so order from there for the exact same product....





    fat ugly baby pictures. Random Images IV
  • Random Images IV



  • ezekielrage_99
    Nov 29, 06:59 AM
    This thing has a serious bug infestation : :eek:
    Zune Scene Tech Support : http://www.zunescene.com/forums/index.php?PHPSESSID=e68f9fffa988200ca99f9040d747224f&board=15.0

    I'll still waiting for the official "it has rootkit" article......

    Can't wait to see that :cool:





    fat ugly baby pictures. some fat ugly girl Pictures,
  • some fat ugly girl Pictures,



  • WildCowboy
    Nov 27, 01:17 PM
    meh - does this matter? Isn't 17" is getting to be a bit skimpy by any consumer standards.

    I don't think so. Many people (myself included) who use notebooks as their primary computers without an external monitor. 17" widescreen is a great size.

    Entry-level mini buyers don't want to spend more on their monitor than they do on their computer.





    fat ugly baby pictures. ugly babies in world.
  • ugly babies in world.



  • Lord Blackadder
    Mar 31, 03:28 PM
    The American obsession with WWII simply isn't healthy.

    Admittedly, the Brits aren't very good at letting it go either.

    It's a fascinating subject, but also an unhealthy obsession for both nations. Also, the literature on the subject is bloated with bad research, crazed theories and revisionism.





    fat ugly baby pictures. You think fat is ugly?
  • You think fat is ugly?



  • itsmeGAV
    Jan 7, 04:06 AM
    http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/921/yoowo.jpg

    Well here is my new pride and joy..
    2009/59 VW Polo GTi, I had to get rid of the R32 as the MPG was stupidly low, and needed something more economical..

    This is the R32, very nice but had to go!
    http://cdn.images.pistonheads.com/aimg/1712/1712243-2.jpg





    fat ugly baby pictures. fat baby side face Are fat
  • fat baby side face Are fat



  • pope
    Jan 13, 09:28 AM
    introducing...MacBook Error





    fat ugly baby pictures. justin bieber fat and ugly.
  • justin bieber fat and ugly.



  • Cassie
    Jan 23, 11:09 PM
    Well, my last post in this thread was just about two weeks ago I suppose. And that truck already died, ha. But, new truck: :)
    http://i55.tinypic.com/2lvbd07.jpg
    http://i51.tinypic.com/w86qfd.jpg
    http://i56.tinypic.com/wbe2qe.jpg
    1988 Ford Ranger XLT Supercab. 2.0 l4, 5 spd manual. Few small issues with it, but it runs pretty well for its age and high mileage, plus only paid $1700 for it. :D Love it to death. :apple: (I admit it, I have some redneck in me :p)





    fat ugly baby pictures. really ugly baby pictures. quot;Please vote for my ugly babyquot;
  • really ugly baby pictures. quot;Please vote for my ugly babyquot;



  • weespeed
    Apr 26, 07:57 PM
    Not "debunked." More like "skirted."



    Nonsense. I dare you to develop and release a word processing application for Windows called "Mattie Num Nums Word" and see how long it takes before Ballmer is on the phone with you.

    Google Word? Apple Word? These would never fly and you know it. Your argument holds no water.

    It's already been done.

    OpenOffice





    Porco
    Apr 19, 04:55 PM
    I've been putting a family member off buying an iMac for months in order to wait for the new ones, I hope the updates are very soon.





    SeaFox
    Dec 28, 01:52 AM
    anything is possible minus 1 thing: the option to dock and iPod simply is so out of place that I do not know why it keeps getting brought up. iTV is focused on streaming content from your computer, not your iPod.
    I think an iPod dock is a great idea. It would be nice to be able to use your iTV for something without a computer running. Hey, take your iPod to a friend's house and you can all watch a movie at their house from your collection, just like taking your entire video library with you.

    There are two problems with this:

    1) HD content takes up a huge amount of space. So if Apple did offer HD movies, the copy iTunes will transfer to your iPod would be reduced quality.

    2) iTunes purchases would not be playable on the component outputs on the iTV. The movie studios would require you use an HDMI connection or something else that supported HDCP to ensure you didn't copy the movie out of the iTunes ecosphere.

    As several of us have discussed before, my hope is that iTV will be able to stream all forms of content on my computer, but with particular emphasis on digital media. So if I want to bring a word doc up and type or a movie I am working on in final cut pro, I can do so. Similarly, and with more fully developed components all my digital media can be run on my tv. The goal is to make this experience integrate all the entertainment features we love, but throughout our homes. Quality preservation is essential and I think they will work to ensure that takes place.

    The issue here is you're asking your iTV to open other files, in other words, you're asking it to be a regular computer. That isn't going to work because it makes the OS/interface more complicated. A home entertainment component needs to be simple and fast. This is where Apple's embedded OSX rumors would be coming in. Everyone read that and thought about the Apple Phone because that was the hot topic of the week and the was the notion of a PDA Apple phone. But an embedded real-time operating system is just what the iTV needs.

    People need to stop comparing the iTV to a Mac Mini, they should thinking of it the same way you think of an XBox compared to a Windows PC. Yeah, they're both made by Microsoft, but the XBox doesn't run Windows, it runs a smaller GUI on top of what is mostly a DirectX back end.

    What's funny is the reason people keep thinking of the Mini is because what consumers really want is an Apple DVR, a Mac Mini with a little stronger hardware, no external power supply, and a built in tuner. Add PVR functionality to Front Row and maybe a little bit more expansive remote and you'd have that. But since the Mini isn't expandable, it isn't even possible for a consumer to cobble together the solution themselves from a PCI tuner card and DVR software available, the closest they can do has lots of "extra parts" lying around from the ElGato external tuner, a monitor adapter to give them the connection they need, and the Mini's power supply, and it still would not be as easy to navigate since a keyboard would probably be needed at some point.

    So a MacMini wont download and play a HD movie or display a word doc, and you need the iTV to accomplish this basic task?

    No, it will do those things, but a MacMini costs $600. Not everyone wants to keep their main computer hooked up to the TV. The iTV allows them to watch their iTunes Store-purchased movies on a larger screen than their regular monitor without moving their computer.

    Also, most people don’t need final cut pro or photo shop. So, that’s why I was thinking this could be a basic computer. If not you will need the mac mini to go with it, and why not simply include the iTV with the Mac Mini so you don’t have two devises in a limited shelf space.

    The iTV is meant to be an add-on to an existing Macintosh household. Not a self-contained entertainment product like a CableCo box or a PS2.

    The idea is the iTV would support more common TV connection methods out of the box, be designed to fit in better aesthetically with home entertainment components, offer better video performance, overall stability, and lower power usage than a MacMini for less.

    Is the problem the iTV will address processing the images or scaling them?
    I hope so. Maybe it will be upconverting for watching current iTunes movies on an HDTV?





    Porchland
    Aug 16, 08:19 AM
    I thought Zune was not (http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1961) going to support wireless music downloads? So many rumors.





    mjteix
    Mar 25, 07:02 PM
    Intel's TDPs are not actual power consumed. So yes, the 130 W scenario still kicks.


    Correct, the power consumed is less than any of the TDP ratings.


    Then why "2x CPUs 130W rated. So thats 260W, right there."?
    If the power consumption is less than the TDP, it should be: 2x CPUs 95W rated. So that's 190W max, anyway.

    If you want an example of power consumption from a similar computer, go here (http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13277_na/13277_na.HTML). The maximum power consumption is 570W for 2x Xeon X5570 (TDP=2x95W), 12GB RAM, FX4800 gpu (TDP=150W), 2x 1TB HDD, ODD, Ethernet, on a 650W 80PLUS� BRONZE PSU.

    If you change the gpu for one with a 300W TDP, and if the power consumption is still less than the TDP, then a 800W PSU would do the trick. No?





    Jaro65
    Apr 19, 09:50 PM
    He looks like a Shaolin Monk merged with Amy Winehouse.

    Hmm...interesting visualization.