obviously
07-27 07:05 AM
The Office of the Ombudsman is usually best addressed through 'non named' communication. By nature of the profession, Ombudsmen as neutral third parties and hence influence greater effects without direct name association. This is a technicality in the ADR/mediation profession.
For those who'd be more comfortable addressing Mr. , by all means no harm, no foul.
In any case, the Office of the Ombudsman in this can can be a POWERFUL resource because it can enable the Govt and USCIS Officials to take corrective action and place motivation on the Ombudsman instead of themselves. Thats how most bureaucracies work, find the person to pin the tail on and play the game.
For those who'd be more comfortable addressing Mr. , by all means no harm, no foul.
In any case, the Office of the Ombudsman in this can can be a POWERFUL resource because it can enable the Govt and USCIS Officials to take corrective action and place motivation on the Ombudsman instead of themselves. Thats how most bureaucracies work, find the person to pin the tail on and play the game.
wallpaper Long, beautiful hair isn#39;t
GC_LOOKIN
12-11 09:56 PM
there is another LUD on my 485 today, continuosly from the last 4 working days Dec6th,7th,10th and today(11th)..not sure what's going on...:confused:
hundal81
05-23 12:23 PM
Sir,
I have extended my H1b visa in Sept. 2010. I appeared for interview in New Delhi and submitted my Passport on 20th of April 2011 and today is 23rd of May 2011. What do you think that how much more time can they take?
Regards
I have extended my H1b visa in Sept. 2010. I appeared for interview in New Delhi and submitted my Passport on 20th of April 2011 and today is 23rd of May 2011. What do you think that how much more time can they take?
Regards
2011 makeup tom cruise long
vin13
01-24 05:20 PM
I am also in the same boat. Would like to know from others if they received any additonal FP requests after 15 months.
more...
arrarrgee
07-17 02:04 PM
I am not sure if core can post the info even if they have....This is a material non public information...could be liable for damages
Not to pressure you or anything, it would be great if you can post what you know....you may not be 100% certain....that is fine.
Not to pressure you or anything, it would be great if you can post what you know....you may not be 100% certain....that is fine.
my2cents
12-15 09:19 PM
we did it in Jan, 06 ....it looks 1.5 Month
more...
trump_gc
06-28 10:28 AM
Thats fine. What you have is much better than what most of us have. Just get an affidavit from her parents or relatives, stating the correct full name etc. That will do it. But do get an affidavit, if u want to avoid RFE later on!
2010 Tom Cruise Long Hair White
DSP
01-13 01:38 AM
I had my parents and my grandmom visit me last year. All three of them went together for the visa interview at Delhi. The only question the officer asked my father was - Why do you want to take your Mom to visit the US 'now'? and my dad replied, 'If I do not take her now, when will I take her?'. They all got a 10 year visa.
Hope that helps,
All the best!
Hope that helps,
All the best!
more...
ganguteli
04-07 09:48 AM
Hi,
I have 2 lawyers to select from. Both are good. One of them is the lawyer company (his office locate in the same city) which is the most expensive. The other lawyer is really good and his expenses is pretty good.
My question is that: Is it better to stuck with the company lawyer as he can handle the perm better. That may because he knows well where to advertise? Or it does not matter? I am just worried that the lawyer that live in another state will not know very well about the city and where he should advertise.
As anyone think, I also want to make sure that he does not over advertise such that we may get many applicants?
Please advise me if I should stuck with the company lawyer or it does not matter?
Thanks
Your lawyer cannot advertise. It is illegal. Your employer has to advertise. The lawyer works with your employer in the Perm process and your employer selects the candidate. So you do not control anything in the PERM process. Also, your employer needs to pay for Perm process and not you.
I have 2 lawyers to select from. Both are good. One of them is the lawyer company (his office locate in the same city) which is the most expensive. The other lawyer is really good and his expenses is pretty good.
My question is that: Is it better to stuck with the company lawyer as he can handle the perm better. That may because he knows well where to advertise? Or it does not matter? I am just worried that the lawyer that live in another state will not know very well about the city and where he should advertise.
As anyone think, I also want to make sure that he does not over advertise such that we may get many applicants?
Please advise me if I should stuck with the company lawyer or it does not matter?
Thanks
Your lawyer cannot advertise. It is illegal. Your employer has to advertise. The lawyer works with your employer in the Perm process and your employer selects the candidate. So you do not control anything in the PERM process. Also, your employer needs to pay for Perm process and not you.
hair tom cruise long hairstyles
eeezzz
07-17 02:12 PM
Where do you guys see this update? link please. I can't find it anywhere.
more...
sona75
07-28 09:48 AM
I am on EAD. my priority date is Oct 2003 EB3.
I got new job that requires security clearance, so applied and got preliminary security clearance and started working as a contractor at Federal worksite.
Now i got letter from Department of homeland security saying i am not allowed to work at Federal worksite because my Adjustment of status is pending from Aug 2007, also saying Contact USCIS to get resolved or provide evidence i am in touch base with USCIS regards to this matter.
Since my priority date is not current, USCIS is not going to anything.
While applying this job i gave my EAD copy. They accepted Now i do know why i got this letter ?
IS there any one had same kind of situation?
Where or whom should I need communicate at USCIS? do they give any letter?
Thanks
I got new job that requires security clearance, so applied and got preliminary security clearance and started working as a contractor at Federal worksite.
Now i got letter from Department of homeland security saying i am not allowed to work at Federal worksite because my Adjustment of status is pending from Aug 2007, also saying Contact USCIS to get resolved or provide evidence i am in touch base with USCIS regards to this matter.
Since my priority date is not current, USCIS is not going to anything.
While applying this job i gave my EAD copy. They accepted Now i do know why i got this letter ?
IS there any one had same kind of situation?
Where or whom should I need communicate at USCIS? do they give any letter?
Thanks
hot tom cruise tropic thunder. tom
dummgelauft
10-06 05:07 PM
Change the title of your little blog to read illegal immigration....
more...
house Tom Cruise#39;s Next Movie Will
drirshad
09-16 04:53 AM
Your husband could have answered this question with his 8th year extension in progress. But here it is, once you start working for a company on H1 and they file ur GC starting with LC and if the process is pending for a year then u get automatic extensions going forward. With PERM the LC is getting approved more faster and you should have it within the year. As for H1 to wait until oct 2007 that will be for new H1's if u were already on a h1 before you can convert to one anytime not waiting until oct2007. :)
tattoo katiebefore Tom Cruise Doesnt
pd_recapturing
04-21 11:26 AM
I am also in same situation where my salary is much less than what is mentioned in LC. I am not sure if its going to affect my 485 application. I have got my 140 approved though. I have asked this question to attorneys and forums and everybody has the same opinion that GC is for future job so it should not matter if one's wages are not matching with LC.
more...
pictures Long Bangs Haircuts for Boys
Blog Feeds
07-08 11:30 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
dresses tom cruise long hairstyle.
vban2007
10-24 10:19 AM
This is a mad rush
more...
makeup tom cruise long hair. Celebrity photograph for sale on ebay Item number: x5
desi3933
07-19 04:34 PM
Hi,
I too have the same question. Isnt EAD a non-immigrant status unlike H1B? So, how can one apply for GC on a non-immigrant status? I might be wrong though.
>> Isn't EAD a non-immigrant status unlike H1B?
EAD is not a status. EAD is just Employment Authorization Document. I-485 pending (AoS Pending) is the status.
>> So, how can one apply for GC on a non-immigrant status?
GC can, also, be applied for someone who is not even in US. Kind of status in US has nothing to do with GC process, as long as one is in valid (authorized) status.
I too have the same question. Isnt EAD a non-immigrant status unlike H1B? So, how can one apply for GC on a non-immigrant status? I might be wrong though.
>> Isn't EAD a non-immigrant status unlike H1B?
EAD is not a status. EAD is just Employment Authorization Document. I-485 pending (AoS Pending) is the status.
>> So, how can one apply for GC on a non-immigrant status?
GC can, also, be applied for someone who is not even in US. Kind of status in US has nothing to do with GC process, as long as one is in valid (authorized) status.
girlfriend tom cruise long hair. Tom Cruise Rocks Out With No
nfinity
08-08 02:24 PM
They will be able to provide you an emergency AP. This has happened in the past. If you can prove the emergency, you can get AP in a few hours.
hairstyles tom cruise and katie holmes
xlr8r
06-10 04:23 PM
Took about 2.5 months for me. I would ask for a complete copy of the Alien record.
I would suggest that you ask them to provide you with the result of the FOIA on a CD. CD has no charge.....
thanks man and one more favor
what should I specify underneath
Identify the documents, records, or information you are seeking. Be as specific as possible.
section if I need all the documents submitted with my I-485 application?
I would suggest that you ask them to provide you with the result of the FOIA on a CD. CD has no charge.....
thanks man and one more favor
what should I specify underneath
Identify the documents, records, or information you are seeking. Be as specific as possible.
section if I need all the documents submitted with my I-485 application?
oldguynewguy
12-18 11:54 PM
Q) What happens to the pending AoS application if I switch jobs from current employer to a different employer on H-1B.?
Q) What happens to my pending AoS if I switch job with different responsibilites on H-1B?
Q) 180 day rule of AC21 portability is applicable as of the receipt data or notice date?
Q) Do I need to file AC21 if working for the same employer in a different position?
Many thanks.
Q) What happens to my pending AoS if I switch job with different responsibilites on H-1B?
Q) 180 day rule of AC21 portability is applicable as of the receipt data or notice date?
Q) Do I need to file AC21 if working for the same employer in a different position?
Many thanks.
WaitingUnlimited
01-18 12:43 PM
First of all, Welcome to Immigration Voice!!
It is possible to get 3 year extension on while you transfer h1b to new company and also obtain the first priority date. First priority date can be obtained while applying for another 140 with new company by attaching the copy of 140 document. But some people say that just mentioning the LIN # is sufficient enough.
What your attorney is saying is true, 140 is owned by the company. But you may request your HR about the value of 140 in extending your stay in US and also in pursuing the green card. That is what I did while changing the job and then our HR did not cancel the 140.
You may lose the priority date if your HR cancels the 140 but some people say that there is a circulation in USCIS which says that even if the 140 is canceled, the first priority date can be assigned as the green card processing was indeed started at the first priority date, so may be it depends on the officer who is handling your case.
Good Luck!!
It is possible to get 3 year extension on while you transfer h1b to new company and also obtain the first priority date. First priority date can be obtained while applying for another 140 with new company by attaching the copy of 140 document. But some people say that just mentioning the LIN # is sufficient enough.
What your attorney is saying is true, 140 is owned by the company. But you may request your HR about the value of 140 in extending your stay in US and also in pursuing the green card. That is what I did while changing the job and then our HR did not cancel the 140.
You may lose the priority date if your HR cancels the 140 but some people say that there is a circulation in USCIS which says that even if the 140 is canceled, the first priority date can be assigned as the green card processing was indeed started at the first priority date, so may be it depends on the officer who is handling your case.
Good Luck!!
